Cycling in Melbourne Australia
I ride with two lights on the front, two on the back. This is why http://ajenningsfrankston.blogspot.com/2011/03/two-lights-at-front-...
Tags:
Permalink Reply by stib on April 5, 2011 at 11:53am Well, I'd say having no helmet is significantly less dangerous than having no lights. But that's a discussion for a different thread maybe.
Given that you can buy reasonably bright LED lights for under $5 in any of those cheapo variety shops there really is no excuse for having no lights. Of course if they're worried about spoiling the nice sleek lines of their fixie by cluttering up the handlebars with useless things like lights and brakes, then we can only hope that when natural selection eventually does its job they don't take anyone else out with them.
Permalink Reply by Chris Harris on April 5, 2011 at 4:54pm Of course.
Lights will help prevent an "accident" whereas a helmet might reduce the effect of an accident.
© 2013 Created by DamianM.